China’s ambassador to Britain has threatened to withdraw Huawei and several billions in investment following the government’s decision to ban the manufacturer’s products from 5G mobile networks.
An op-ed attributed to Liu Xiaoming and published in the South China Morning Post this morning said: “In 2018, the company announced a further investment plan of £3bn in the next five years, which is a positive vote for growth in Britain. Unfortunately, this will now be subject to uncertainties in light of the British government’s recent decision.”
That decision amounts to a total rip ‘n’ replace of Huawei equipment from Britain’s nascent 5G networks by 2027, as announced earlier this month. Following US sanctions aimed at disrupting Huawei’s use of US chip design tech, Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) declared it would not vet homegrown Chinese chips in Huawei equipment, giving the government justification for a ban on national security grounds.
“Huawei is a leader in 5G,” continued Ambassador Liu. “Britain could either choose to cooperate with Huawei and gain an edge in the era of the digital economy, or refuse such cooperation and give up leadership in a 5G-dominated future.”
The ambassador’s rhetoric clearly points to China seeing the Huawei ban as a direct slight to his nation and thus deserving of a state-level response. Banning the Chinese firm from Britain’s phone networks will cost half a billion pounds, as Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden claimed when the ban was announced a fortnight ago.
Where the £3bn sum comes from is unclear; if announced in 2018, it may be the full sum of the £2bn investment pledged by Huawei after last year’s “pisspoor” grading from NCSC and the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre.
Ambassador Liu’s threat of total withdrawal was not echoed by Huawei, however. A company spokesman told The Register: “We have announced no change to our strategy. We will conduct a detailed review of what the announcement means for our business here in the UK; it remains too early to speculate.”
https://www.theregister.com/
